283 research outputs found

    Asymptotic Capacity of Large Relay Networks with Conferencing Links

    Full text link
    In this correspondence, we consider a half-duplex large relay network, which consists of one source-destination pair and NN relay nodes, each of which is connected with a subset of the other relays via signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-limited out-of-band conferencing links. The asymptotic achievable rates of two basic relaying schemes with the "pp-portion" conferencing strategy are studied: For the decode-and-forward (DF) scheme, we prove that the DF rate scales as O(log(N))\mathcal{O} (\log (N)); for the amplify-and-forward (AF) scheme, we prove that it asymptotically achieves the capacity upper bound in some interesting scenarios as NN goes to infinity.Comment: submitted to IEEE Transactions on Communication

    Asymptotic Capacity of Large Fading Relay Networks with Random Node Failures

    Full text link
    To understand the network response to large-scale physical attacks, we investigate the asymptotic capacity of a half-duplex fading relay network with random node failures when the number of relays NN is infinitely large. In this paper, a simplified independent attack model is assumed where each relay node fails with a certain probability. The noncoherent relaying scheme is considered, which corresponds to the case of zero forward-link channel state information (CSI) at the relays. Accordingly, the whole relay network can be shown equivalent to a Rayleigh fading channel, where we derive the ϵ\epsilon-outage capacity upper bound according to the multiple access (MAC) cut-set, and the ϵ\epsilon-outage achievable rates for both the amplify-and-forward (AF) and decode-and-forward (DF) strategies. Furthermore, we show that the DF strategy is asymptotically optimal as the outage probability ϵ\epsilon goes to zero, with the AF strategy strictly suboptimal over all signal to noise ratio (SNR) regimes. Regarding the rate loss due to random attacks, the AF strategy suffers a less portion of rate loss than the DF strategy in the high SNR regime, while the DF strategy demonstrates more robust performance in the low SNR regime.Comment: 24 pages, 5 figures, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Communication
    corecore